January 15, 2021


Ottawa councillors responsible for prioritizing transportation projects had “the loop” whirling in their minds Monday as they debated the future of an interprovincial rail line.

Maxime Pedneaud-Jobin wearing glasses and looking at the camera: FILES: Gatineau Mayor Maxime Pedneaud-Jobin said he doesn't want the idea of a loop to get in the way of authorities making prompt decisions on the current STO plan.

© Provided by Ottawa Citizen
FILES: Gatineau Mayor Maxime Pedneaud-Jobin said he doesn’t want the idea of a loop to get in the way of authorities making prompt decisions on the current STO plan.

The transportation committee endorsed recommendations by Ottawa staff to support two options for bringing trams over the Portage Bridge and into downtown Ottawa, with an expensive Sparks Street tunnel, in the committee’s opinion, being the “optimal” method compared to running a twin-track tram on the surface of Wellington Street.

The Société de transport de l’Outaouais (STO) is planning the new transit system between Aylmer and Ottawa’s parliamentary precinct. No money from City of Ottawa property taxpayers would be required, but council on Nov. 25 needs to give its blessing to STO and the City of Gatineau to pursue the project on Ottawa streets.

Meanwhile, advocates of a transit loop connecting the downtowns of Hull and Ottawa using the Portage and Alexandra bridges, combined with Wellington Street in Ottawa and Laurier Street in Gatineau, have seized the opportunity and successfully planted the idea in the minds of Ottawa councillors.

Gatineau Mayor Maxime Pedneaud-Jobin, who attended the virtual committee meeting, said he doesn’t want the idea of a loop to get in the way of authorities making prompt decisions on the current STO plan, which goes no farther than Elgin Street in Ottawa.

While Pedneaud-Jobin said he sees “no contradiction between the loop and our project,” he considers the current STO plan as a first phase before building a transit loop.

Pedneaud-Jobin and STO need the federal government to provide funding for the transit plan. The Quebec government has signalled its commitment to the project, but, as Pedneaud-Jobin pointed out, the province wouldn’t be interested in funding infrastructure on the other side of the Ottawa River.

The difference in cost between the Wellington Street and Sparks Street options is significant.

The Wellington Street surface option with three stations would cost $3.03 billion. The Sparks Street tunnel option with two stations would cost between $3.53 billion and $3.9 billion.

The money is just one factor — albeit a big one — in the decision to build rail on the surface or underground. The future of Ottawa’s prime tourist attraction, Parliament Hill and the surrounding precinct, is a top concern when it comes to the prospect of running trams on Wellington Street.

Coun. Matthew Luloff called the Parliament Buildings “most iconic vista we have in the city” in voicing his preference for a tram running in a tunnel under Sparks Street, whose pedestrian mall could benefit from increased foot traffic from two stations.

Other councillors see an opportunity too good to pass up with the prospect of a tram running on Wellington Street.

Coun. Catherine McKenney, whose Somerset ward includes the parliamentary precinct, said the city should commit to removing traffic from Wellington Street, though